Veterans Claims· 10/17/1996

Parker v. Brown

Citations

9 Vet. App. 476
1996 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 803
1996 WL 603783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that VA’s use of specified VA form for recording of results of VA field review of foreclosure appraiser’s report in home-loan-guaranty case was not prejudicial where “appellant has not alleged that any prejudice resulted from this error”
stating that prejudice means “injury to an interest that the ... regulation was designed to protect”
stating that “ ‘[prejudice ... means injury to an interest that the statute, regulation, or rule in question was designed to protect’ ” (quoting Intercargo Ins. Co. v. United States, 83 F.3d 391, 396 (Fed.Cir.1996))
finding that technical error in the absence of prejudice to be harmless
finding that technical error in the absence of prejudice to be harmless
referring to “ ‘interest that the statute ... in question was designed to protect’ ” (quoting Intercargo Ins. Co. v. United States, 83 F.3d 391, 396 (Fed.Cir.1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.