Skip to main content
· 1/28/1983

Parker v. Bell Ford, Inc.

Citations

  • 425 So. 2d 1101
  • 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice is a condition precedent to recovery and affirming directed verdict against plaintiff who failed to provide notice prior to filing suit
  • “This court, on several occasions, has characterized notice, such as required by § 7-2-607, as a condition precedent to recovery.”
  • notice as required by § 2-607(3)(a) is a precedent to recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Embry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.