Skip to main content
· 10/3/2008

Parker v. Bagley

Citations

  • 543 F.3d 859
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20838
  • 2008 WL 4443802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that in non-capital cases, untimeliness of a Ohio Rule 26(B) application to reopen was an adequate and independent state procedural ground
  • noting that Franklin was a capital case
  • claims raised in a Rule 26(B) application that the Ohio court of appeals rejected as untimely are procedurally defaulted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daughtrey, McKeague, Van Tatenhove

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.