Park v. Trustees of the 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where ”[t]he plaintiffs did not file a Statement in response as required by Local Rule 56.1(b)[,] .... the facts in the defendants’ December 9, 2004 Statement will be deemed admitted if they are supported by the record”
• “The definition is limited to persons designated by the participant, or by the terms of the plan.” (alternation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• nformal inquiry concerning pension rights and subsequent suit by estate in state surrogate’s court did not constitute exhaustion of administrative remedies, where no application for benefits had been made or denied and administrative remedies under plan had not been pursued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).