Park v. NMSI, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that report of colleagues’ opinion that plaintiff was an “intellectual gigolo” could be defamatory
• holding that falsity is a question of fact for a fact-finder to determine when differing evidence is presented
• holding that a jury may find knowledge or reckless disregard of falsity when a publication attributes to the plaintiff quoted statements that the plaintiff never actually made
• holding that a determination of whether the alteration of a quotation concerning the subject of an interview constituted \actual malice\ was dependent on the context of the interview
• holding that a determination of whether the alteration of a quotation concerning the subject of an interview constituted “actual malice” was dependent on the context of the interview
• holding that \plaintiff must demonstrate that the author in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of his publication\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).