· 2/8/1991
Park South Tenants Corp. v. 200 Central Park South Associates, L.P.
Citations
- 754 F. Supp. 352
- 1991 WL 3485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The standard . . . is strict in order to preclude repetitive arguments on issues that have already been considered fully by the Court.”
- “The standard . . . is strict in order to preclude repetitive arguments on issues that have already been considered fully by the Court.”
- “The standard . . . is strict in order to preclude repetitive arguments on issues that have already been considered fully by the Court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William C. Conner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.