Skip to main content
· 2/8/1991

Park South Tenants Corp. v. 200 Central Park South Associates, L.P.

Citations

  • 754 F. Supp. 352
  • 1991 WL 3485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The standard . . . is strict in order to preclude repetitive arguments on issues that have already been considered fully by the Court.”
  • “The standard . . . is strict in order to preclude repetitive arguments on issues that have already been considered fully by the Court.”
  • “The standard . . . is strict in order to preclude repetitive arguments on issues that have already been considered fully by the Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.