Park, Chan v. Elaine McKeon & Exxon Mobil Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding as a matter of law that premises owner owed no duty under the Timberwalk factors
• “[T]aking measures to protect against the possibility of future crime is not the same as foreseeing that criminal activity.”
• “[T]aking measures to protect 22 against the possibility of future crime is not the same as foreseeing that criminal activity.”
• limiting crimes to those occurring at a gas station or immediately adjacent to the gas station and rejecting reliance on evidence of violent crimes reported within a one-mile radius of the gas station
• “The mere act of taking preventative measures to protect against the possibility of future crime is not the same as foreseeing that criminal activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).