Parish v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in adopting the Product Restatement, the Supreme Court of Iowa also adopted the associated commentary
• noting, in adopting the Product Restatement, the Supreme Court of Iowa also adopted the associated commentary
• stating the requirement for a response to a motion for summary judgment must assert genuine issues of facts, Which are sufficient if “a reasonable fact finder could return a verdict or decision for the nonmoving party based upon those facts”
• stating the requirement for a response to a motion for summary judgment must assert genuine issues of facts, which are sufficient if “a reasonable fact finder could return a verdict or decision for the nonmoving party based upon those facts”
• stating the 4 requirement for a response to a motion for summary judgment must assert genuine issues of facts, which are sufficient if “a reasonable fact finder could return a verdict or decision for the nonmoving party based upon those facts”
• “A fact is material if it will affect the outcome of the suit, given the applicable law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).