Parish ex rel. Theriot v. Donatien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• alteration omitted and quoting Wider v. Colvin, 245 F. Supp. 3d 381, 389 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)
• alteration omitted and quoting Wider v. Colvin, 245 F. Supp. 3d 381, 389 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)
• “[N]urse practitioners are not considered ‘acceptable medical sources,’ and their opinions are therefore not ‘entitled to any particular weight.’” (alteration omitted and quoting Wider v. Colvin, 245 F. Supp. 3d 381, 389 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).