Parish & Bingham Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fifteen months confinement in administrative segregation did not deprive the inmate of a liberty interest under Sandin
• holding that exposure to confinement with closer supervision and control for “periods as long as 15 months” did not constitute a due process violation
• holding that the restrictive conditions in administrative custody in the Pennsylvania state correctional institutions, in and of themselves, do not violate the Eighth Amendment
• holding that confinement in the RHU for up to fifteen months without any pre-transfer hearing implicated no protected due process interest
• holding that a period of as long as fifteen months would still fall'within the expected parameters
• holding that plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim failed 3 because he “presented no evidence that he was denied basic human needs, such as food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care and personal safety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).