Parini v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a workers' compensation lien holder is not entitled to \a pro-rata share of the pre-judgment interest [a] plaintiff received on his third party recovery\
• G.S. § 97-10.2(f)(1)(c) provides for reimbursement to defendant insurance company \for all benefits ... paid or to be paid by the employer under award of the Industrial Commission\ and \does not state that [insurance company is] entitled to any prejudgment interest\
• G.S. § 97-10.2(f)(l)(c) provides for reimbursement to defendant insurance company “for all benefits . . . paid or to be paid by the employer under award of the Industrial Commission” and “does not state that [insurance company is] entitled to any prejudgment interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).