Parham v. Horace Mann Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Wle conclude the procedural error committed by the trial court ... [was] harmless, and decline to reverse the final decision of the trial court.”
• “[T]his Court will afford great weight to a trial court’s findings as to whether a peremptory strike was used to advance” discrimination
• “[W]e conclude the procedural error committed by the trial court . . . [was] harmless, and decline to reverse the final decision of the trial court.”
• “[T]he trial court clearly informed the jury that Appellees had the burden to prove it made a commercially reasonable offer of insurance and that Appellants made a knowing and intelligent rejection of such insurance.”
• “[W]e conclude the procedural error committed by the trial court did not result in substantial injustice or prejudice the substantive rights of Appellants. Therefore, we consider such error harmless, and decline to reverse the final decision of the trial court.”
• “[W]e conclude the procedural error committed by the trial court did not result in substantial injustice or prejudice the substantive rights of Appellants. Therefore, we consider such error harmless, and decline to reverse the final decision of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).