Skip to main content
· 7/15/1878

Pargoud v. Richardson

Citations

  • 30 La. 1286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court would have jurisdiction, “under ultra vires review,” to hear the plaintiff’s claim that the agency was statutorily required to make an adjustment under subsection (t)(2)(E)
  • “[I]f a counterclaim is compulsory, the Court has 17 supplemental jurisdiction because a counterclaim which arises out of the same transaction 18 or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim also necessarily arises from the same common 19 nucleus of operative fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Egan, Manning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.