· 7/15/1878
Pargoud v. Richardson
Citations
- 30 La. 1286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court would have jurisdiction, “under ultra vires review,” to hear the plaintiff’s claim that the agency was statutorily required to make an adjustment under subsection (t)(2)(E)
- “[I]f a counterclaim is compulsory, the Court has 17 supplemental jurisdiction because a counterclaim which arises out of the same transaction 18 or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim also necessarily arises from the same common 19 nucleus of operative fact”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Egan, Manning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.