Pargoud v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing the appropriate remedy where the procedural history included a five-day bench trial and a ruling on the merits in the plaintiffs’ favor which was affirmed on appeal
• “Given that [the argument that the legislature lacked authority to act] implicates an unsettled question of state law, [this] argument is more appropriately directed to North Carolina courts, the final arbiters of state law.”
• “Given that [the argument that the legislature lacked authority to act] implicates an unsettled question of state law, [this] argument is more appropriately directed to North Carolina courts, the final arbiters of state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).