Pargman v. Vickers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for an amendment to relate back to the original complaint, “the plaintiff must show,” inter alia, “that the to-be-named defendant knew or should have known that the plaintiff would have sued it but for a mistake”
• interpretation of Rule 15(c) is an issue of law reviewed de novo
• insurer’s knowledge of cognizable Rule 15(c) mistake imputed to its insured’s estate
• insurer’s notice of an action imputed to its insured’s estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).