Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “claims ‘arising out of’ the [a]greement[] would seem to cover direct claims for breach of the [a]greement or fraud in the inducement”
• “Civil conspiracy ... provides a mechanism to impute liability to those not a direct party to the underlying [wrong].”
• “Civil conspiracy . . . provides a mechanism to impute liability to those not a direct party to the underlying [wrong].”
• ―Civil conspiracy thus provides a mechanism to impute liability to those not a direct party to the underlying tort. As such, it can be viewed as parallel to aiding and abetting.‖
• “The first phrase of the clause, which requires arbitration of claims ‘arising out of’ the Agreement, would seem to cover direct claims for breach of the Agreement or fraud in the inducement.”
• “Our corporate case law has thrown [the so-called ‘constructive fraud’] concept around in a not particularly precise way, but always in a context in which the court is examining whether directors have complied with their fiduciary duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).