Pardee v. Personal Representative for the Estate of Pardee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an estate may enforce a common law waiver against a named beneficiary because the “pension plan funds were no longer entitled to ERISA protection once the plan funds were distributed”
• distinguishing Boggs and finding that post-disbursement ERISA funds were no longer entitled to ERISA protection
• distinguishing Boggs and holding that ERISA did not preempt enforcement of allocation of ERISA benefits in state-court divorce decree as “the pension plan funds were no longer entitled to ERISA protection once the plan funds were distributed”
• distinguishing Boggs and holding that ERISA did not preempt enforcement of allocation of ERISA benefits in state-court divorce decree as ‘the pension plan funds were no longer entitled to ERISA protection once the plan funds were distributed’
• distinguishing Boggs and holding that ERISA did not preempt enforcement of allocation of ERISA benefits in state- court divorce decree as “the pension plan funds were no longer entitled to ERISA protection once the plan funds were distributed”
• ERISA does not preempt enforcement of divorce decree regarding allocation of ERISA benefits because “pension plan funds were no longer entitled to ERISA protection once the plan funds were distributed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).