Skip to main content
· 10/6/1988

Parce v. Byrd

Citations

  • 533 So. 2d 812
  • 1988 WL 101543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant’s consent to mistrial was not implied where defense had “indicated a willingness to proceed with the trial if sanctions were denied”
  • no manifest necessity where new evidence discovered after jury had been sworn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.