Parashu Giri v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that admitting the key facts providing the basis for removal withdraws the issue from controversy
• explaining that admitting the key facts providing the basis for removal withdraws the issue from controversy
• respondent failed to present evidence supporting a good-cause finding
• no abuse of discretion in denying continuance to allow petitioner time to submit fingerprints when petitioner had more than a year and a half to prepare for merits hearing, had been warned of the deadlines, and did not request a continuance in advance of the hearing
• no abuse of discretion in denying continuance to allow petitioner time to submit fingerprints when petitioner had more than a year and a half to prepare for merits hearing, had been warned of the deadlines, and did not request a continuance in advance of the hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).