Skip to main content
· 5/24/1991

Paramus Substantive Certification No. 47

Citations

  • 249 N.J. Super. 1
  • 591 A.2d 1345
  • 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accepting petition for voluntary discipline and imposing review panel reprimand where lawyer neglected client matter, causing significant delay in proceedings, and where lawyer had prior instance of public disciplinary sanction and there were several mitigating factors
  • reprimand from the Review Board’s predecessor when attorney acknowledged violating Rules 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 by failing to timely perform the necessary work on an adoption, causing a significant delay in the proceedings, and failing to adequately communicate with the client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.