Parajecki v. International Business MacHines Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• bairing claim for injury diagnosed within statutory period because plaintiff provided no evidence this injury was separate and distinct from injuries suffered outside of the statutory period
• barring claim brought more than three years following plaintiffs last use of the product
• “Plaintiffs must ... come forward with some evidence that any injuries sustained ... within the statutory period were separate and distinct from any injuries ... sustained outside the statutory period.”
• “It may be that [plaintiffs] alleged ... injury is separate and distinct from the injuries that she allegedly sustained outside the statutory period. Plaintiffs, however, have provided no evidence, expert or otherwise, to support that contention.”
• rejecting claims for new injuries on same ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).