Paragon Ltd., Inc. v. Boles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he United States Supreme Court made clear that [a distinction between void and voidable contracts in deciding whether to apply the holding of Buckeye ] is irrelevant.”
• ‘Therefore, the arbitration clause in the contract between Paragon and Boles is enforceable, and it is irrelevant whether Paragon’s actions render the contract as a whole void. That question is for the arbitrator to decide, not this Court.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).