Skip to main content

Paradis v. State

Citations

  • 912 P.2d 110
  • 128 Idaho 223
  • 1996 Ida. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We conclude that applying I.C. § 19-2719 does not constitute an ex post facto application of the law.”
  • \We conclude that applying I.C. § 19-2719 does not constitute an ex post facto application of the law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, McDEVITT, Newhouse, Silak, Tern, Trout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.