Parada Holding Co. v. Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, where the trial court has addressed the issues sought to be raised on appeal, we need not remand for the filing of a concise statement nunc pro tunc
• stating that “[w]hen counsel has filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement and the trial court has addressed those issues[,] we need not remand and may address the merits of the issues presented.”
• directing trial court to address an untimely statement without direction for remand to avoid unnecessary delay
• remanding for responsive trial court opinion when Appellant filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement
• stating “[w]hen counsel has filed an untimely Rule 1925(b) statement and the trial court has addressed those issues we need not remand and may address the merits of the issues presented”
• failure to timely file court-ordered Rule 1925(b) statement constitutes per se ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).