Papo v. Aglo Restaurants of San Jose, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Michigan Supreme Court has \acknowledged that the corporate veil can be pierced in the absence of fraud\ and upholding a veil-piercing claim based on the breach of a lease
• noting that the Michigan Supreme Court has “acknowledged that the corporate veil can be pierced in the absence of fraud” and upholding a veil-piercing claim based on the breach of a lease
• noting that the Michigan Supreme Court has “acknowledged that the corporate veil can be pierced in the absence of fraud” and upholding a veil-piercing claim based on the breach of a lease
• noting that the Michigan Supreme Court has “acknowledged that the corporate veil can be pierced in the absence of fraud” and upholding a veil- piercing claim based on the breach of a lease
• piercing corporate veil of lessee corporation to hold parent corporation jointly liable on judgment
• explicitly holding that the existence of “fraud” is not a requisite for piercing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).