Paper Corp. of the United States v. Schoeller Technical Papers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to order new trial where “a reasonable jury” could have believed plaintiff’s witnesses regarding the parties’ obligations since they “were the only people to testify who had first-hand knowledge of the commitments made by [defendant]” five years earlier
• “The failure of an agreement explicitly to require one party to promise to purchase from the party who has promised to sell does not render the agreement unenforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).