Papa v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a sentence is procedurally unreasonable “if the district court . . . fails adequately to explain the chosen sentence”
• stating that a sentence is procedurally unreasonable “if the district court . . . fails adequately to explain the chosen sentence”
• affirming, in sentencing context, that conduct underlying a dismissed charge may be considered where appropriate factual findings as to the conduct are made
• \The standard of review on the appeal of a sentence for violation of supervised release is ... whether the sentence imposed is reasonable.\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Ordinarily, conduct underlying acquitted or dismissed charges or uncharged conduct may be taken into account in sentencing if the government establishes that conduct by a preponderance of the evidence.”
• ʺThe standard of review on the appeal of a sentence for violation of supervised release is . . . whether the sentence imposed is reasonable.ʺ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).