Skip to main content
· 5/1/2024

Papa Ndiasse Ndiaye v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that limitations period had not begun where we vacated convictions but district court had not yet entered an amended judgment
  • “The district court will not review a section 2255 motion until the direct appeal is resolved.”
  • conviction not final until lower court acts on remand to amend judgment
  • conviction not final until lower court acts on remand to amend judgment
  • “We conclude that the one-year time bar [under AEDPA] will begin to run after the district court enters an amended judgment [on remand] and either the direct appeal has been resolved or the time to appeal has passed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.