Paolino v. McCormick & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is impermissible for a party to appeal or cross-appeal from a judgment that was favorable to that party
• holding order denying TTD benefits finally adjudicated claimant’s potential legal rights was final and appealable
• explaining the holding in Munson as permitting an appellee, or an appellate court sua sponte, to raise the issue of standing where there is an alternative ground to uphold the trial court’s ruling
• Commission’s statement as to limitations was no more than step in reasoning that allowed Commission to reach dispositive issue
• “[I]f the losing party appeals, the winning party may argue as a ground for affirmance matters resolved against it at trial.”
• only the order by which the Commission disposes of a case qualifies as a decision within the meaning of LE section 9—745(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).