Panzica v. Panzica

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a father facing termination of his parental rights did not \knowingly and intelligently waive\ his right to counsel because after his public defender withdrew, the court failed to notify him of his right to have new counsel appointed
• stating that parents who desire to represent themselves in a TPR proceeding must understand that they will have to comply with the rules of evidence and civil procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).