Panzica v. Interdiction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that plaintiff must show that “injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise,” but highlighting the import of harm suffered by plaintiff from reliance on the promise in determining injustice (quotation omitted)
• “As a general rule, however, the state is not estopped in the exercise of its governmental functions by the acts of its officers.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting McCoy v. State, 277 A.2d 675, 676 (Del. 1971))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).