Skip to main content
· 4/15/1988

Panwitz v. Miller Farm-Home Oil Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 422 N.W.2d 63
  • 228 Neb. 220
  • 1988 Neb. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in a vendor/vendee relationship, the majority view is that if the assignee offers and is able to complete performance, a contract provision requiring a seller's consent has limited application
  • holding that in a vendor/vendee relationship, the majority view is that if the assignee offers and is able to complete performance, a contract provision requiring a seller's consent has limited application
  • holding contractual provision prohibiting assignment without vendor’s consent “does not preclude such assignment or sale if the contract has been fully performed or if assignee offers and is able to complete performance” (emphasis omitted)
  • reciting that proper rule of construction is that more specific term of contract will control over general provision of contract - 15 - as it relates to same subject matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Risxd, Boslaugh, Caporale, Grant, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.