· 12/15/1977
Panther Pumps & Equipment Company, Inc., Now Morrison Pump Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc., Paul W. Schlosser and Edward Drath
Citations
- 566 F.2d 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing the substitution of a corporation’s president under Rule 25(c) and holding him personally liable for the full judgment where he had fraudulently attempted to avoid the judgment by transferring the defendant-corporation’s assets to a new corporation
- \(y)ou are requested to appear . . . to review the evidence in (the) case . . .\
- substitution sought because a non-party purchased the defendant’s stock and drained off its only significant asset
- denial of motion to substitute is reviewable once there is a final decision
- “The very nature of Rule 25(c) vests a great deal of discretion in the hands of the court. It is not mandatory that a substitution be made in every case of a transfer of interest.”
- where entire business transferred to successor, court found successor liable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swygert, Cummings, Markey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.