Skip to main content
· 12/15/1977

Panther Pumps & Equipment Company, Inc., Now Morrison Pump Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc., Paul W. Schlosser and Edward Drath

Citations

  • 566 F.2d 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing the substitution of a corporation’s president under Rule 25(c) and holding him personally liable for the full judgment where he had fraudulently attempted to avoid the judgment by transferring the defendant-corporation’s assets to a new corporation
  • \(y)ou are requested to appear . . . to review the evidence in (the) case . . .\
  • substitution sought because a non-party purchased the defendant’s stock and drained off its only significant asset
  • denial of motion to substitute is reviewable once there is a final decision
  • “The very nature of Rule 25(c) vests a great deal of discretion in the hands of the court. It is not mandatory that a substitution be made in every case of a transfer of interest.”
  • where entire business transferred to successor, court found successor liable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Cummings, Markey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.