· 9/30/2002
Pantelidis v. Pantelidis
Citations
- 297 A.D.2d 791
- 747 N.Y.2d 809
- 747 N.Y.S.2d 809
- 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8883
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The plain language of § 315(e)(1) is clear that estoppel is triggered when an IPR proceeding results in a final written decision.”
- “The plain language of § 315(e)(1) is clear that estoppel is triggered when an IPR proceeding results in a final written decision.”
- “The plain language of § 315(e)(1) is clear that estoppel is triggered when an IPR proceeding results in a final written decision.”
- “The plain language of § 315(e)(1) is clear that estoppel is triggered when an IPR proceeding results in a final written decision.”
- “[A]s the master of its own petition, Intuitive could have made its challenges more pointed and specific . . . .”
- “[A]s the master of its own petition, Intuitive could have made its challenges more pointed and specific . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.