Pantalone v. Aurora Pump Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that to succeed on a motion to remand under the federal remove statutes, “a defendant’s showing need not go beyond adequately supported assertions,” in its Notice of Removal. (citation omitted)
• “The propriety of removal under the statute should be considered at the time of removal.”
• manufacturer acting pursuant to contract with, and according to specifications of, the United States Navy, establishes first prong of federal officer removal statute
• removal period was triggered even though plaintiff did not specify whether exposure to defendant’s asbestos-containing products occurred “during his Navy service” or “during his post-Navy career”
• “Although a defendant must ‘apply a reasonable amount of intelligence in ascertaining removability,’ it need not “look beyond the initial pleading for facts giving rise to removability.”
• complaint alleged that plaintiff “was exposed to various asbestos containing products while in the U.S. Navy... during the years 1951-1956”; removal period was triggered by discovery responses disclosing make the case removable. (Id. at 16

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-09-24· cited 32×
• Tolley v. Monsanto Co.
  S.D. West Virginia· 2008-12-19· cited 25×
• Ayotte v. Boeing Co.
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-06-22· cited 10×
• Depascale v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2008-10-30· cited 2×
• Razmzan v. United States
  Second Circuit· 2021-01-26

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 2,082×
• Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,208×
• Pullman Co. v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court· 1939-01-16· cited 698×
• Willingham v. Morgan
  Supreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 653×
• Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-11· cited 584×
• Arizona v. Manypenny
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 451×
• Jefferson County v. Acker
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 428×
• Tennessee v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 383×
• California v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (\MTBE\) Products Liability Litigation)
  Second Circuit· 2007-05-24· cited 232×
• Vera v. Saks & Co.
  Second Circuit· 2003-07-10· cited 181×
• Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.
  Second Circuit· 2008-02-22· cited 93×
• MacHnik v. Buffalo Pumps Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2007-09-17· cited 13×
• Contois v. Able Industries Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2007-11-13· cited 6×