Skip to main content
· 2/2/1995

Pannell v. Future Now

Citations

  • 895 F. Supp. 196
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15743
  • 1995 WL 469536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding personal injury plaintiff’s employment records from past employers discoverable to the extent they contained information about preexisting medical conditions
  • ordering plaintiff to provide an unlimited authorization for employment records as the discovery process is very liberal and allows for “the fullest possible knowledge of the issues and facts before trial’’
  • “implausible to believe that the Post Office would cease its practice of investigating accidents and writing up the results, in order to prevent future accidents, on the basis that such reports could be discoverable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCalla

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.