Pannell v. Food Services of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that front pay issue is not too speculative to go to jury, and endorsing it as substitute for reinstatement, citing Ninth Circuit's decision in Cassino
• holding that front pay issue is not too speculative to go to jury, and endorsing it as substitute for reinstatement, citing Ninth Circuit's decision in Cassino
• approving jury instruction that plaintiff must prove age was a determining factor in his termination
• approving jury instruction that plaintiff must prove age was a determining factor in his termination
• approving instruction that plaintiff must prove age was a determining factor in termination
• plaintiffs' employment discrimination action damages for front pay were duplicative as a matter of law to damages for lost business opportunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).