Pannell v. Bayne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Congress intended judicial 23 interpretation of the Rehabilitation Act be incorporated by reference when interpreting the ADA”
• affirming summary judgment where 24 the employer terminated employees for their misconduct, rather than any alleged 25 disability
• “Unless [plaintiff] can show that [defendant’s] explanation for [plaintiffs] discharge was a pretext for disability discrimination, [she has] ... presented no triable issue under the ADA.”
• “Courts have recognized a distinction between termination of employment because of misconduct and termination of employment because of a disability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).