Pankow v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court’s erroneous exclusion of competent evidence will not require reversal “if the substance of the excluded evidence got to the jury through another source”
• “[F]actual statements contained in pleadings filed on behalf of a party may be considered as admissions.”
• \Factual statements in pleadings are conclusive against the pleader in the proceedings in which they were filed until they have been amended or withdrawn.\
• “Factual statements in pleadings are conclusive against the pleader in the proceedings in which they were filed until they have been amended or withdrawn”
• “[F]actual statements contained in pleadings filed on behalf of a party may be considered as admissions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).