Pankau v. SunTrust Mortg., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because appellant’s petition was facially sufficient, he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing so that he could prove that his motivation for changing his name was without ulterior or illegal motive, a requirement of section 68.07(j), Florida Statutes
• “[t]he trial court committed reversible error when it failed to provide Hoyos with an opportunity to present evidence and to be heard” before denying his name-change petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).