Skip to main content
· 5/8/1982

Panhandle Agri-Service, Inc. v. Becker

Citations

  • 644 P.2d 413
  • 231 Kan. 291
  • 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1320
  • 1982 Kan. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • buyer who traveled in and out of state to fulfill contracts was not doing business in the state
  • reference to specific quantity of material to be supplied gave the contract a duration: the time necessary for that quantity in fact to be supplied
  • “We find nothing which would justify the trial court in arriving at damages using loss of business profits which are consequential damages.”
  • a contract for the sale of a definite amount of hay during a crop year is not indefinite in duration even though the contract was extended to the next year because of a crop shortage
  • purchase of hay by foreign corporation and sending of agents into state to receive delivery was not sufficient to constitute doing business where corporation’s products were not delivered in state for sale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.