Pandora Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications Inc. (In Re Wingspread Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The relevant question in the subrogation context is not simply whether the party was directly liable, but rather whether its payment was used to satisfy another’s obligation.”
• “The relevant question in the subrogation context is not simply whether the party was directly liable, but rather whether its payment was used to satisfy another’s obligation.”
• “The relevant question in the subrogation context is not simply whether the party was directly liable, but rather whether its payment was used to satisfy another’s obligation.”
• “The relevant question in the subrogation context is not simply whether the party was directly liable, but rather whether its payment was used to satisfy another’s obligation.”
• “The relevant question in the subrogation context is not simply whether the party was directly liable, but rather whether its payment was used to satisfy another’s obligation.”
• “The relevant question in the subrogation context is not simply whether the party was directly liable, but rather whether its payment was used to satisfy another’s obligation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).