Panditi v. Apostle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a verified denial “destroys the evidentiary effect of the itemized account attached to the petition and forces the plaintiff to put on proof of his claim”
• explaining that a verified denial “destroys the evidentiary effect of the itemized account attached to the petition and forces the plaintiff to put on proof of his claim”
• noting that Rule 185 requires sworn denial to be written and verified by affidavit
• explaining that a verified denial A destroys the evidentiary effect of the itemized account attached to the petition and forces the plaintiff to put on proof of his claim @
• stating requirements for sworn account petition and accompanying affidavit, including requirement that account “show with reasonable certainty the name, date, and charge for each item, and provide specifics or details as to how the figures were arrived at”
• “If there is a deficiency in the plaintiff’s sworn account, the account will not constitute prima facie evidence of the debt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).