Skip to main content
· 2/11/2009

Panchu v. State

Citations

  • 1 So. 3d 1243
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1111
  • 2009 WL 321569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant was entitled to evidentiary hearing where she stated colorable claim in rule 3.170(£
  • “A defendant who files a facially sufficient motion to withdraw a plea is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the issue unless the record conclusively refutes the allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor, Gross, Hazouri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.