Pananyan v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that inmate's claim \that every ill befalling him must be retaliatory because everyone knows him to be litigious and a frequent correspondent with the grievance officer—falls short of stating a claim even under notice pleading\
• stating that inmate's claim \that every ill befalling him must be retaliatory because everyone knows him to be litigious and a frequent correspondent with the grievance officer—falls short of stating a claim even under notice pleading\
• stating that inmate's claim \that every ill befalling him must be retaliatory because everyone knows him to be litigious and a frequent correspondent with the grievance officer—falls short of stating a claim even under notice pleading\
• stating that inmate's claim \that every ill befalling him must be retaliatory because everyone knows him to be litigious and a frequent correspondent with the grievance officer—falls short of stating a claim even under notice pleading\
• “Since May 2003 the grievance procedures applicable to Illinois prisons have included a particularity requirement[.]”
• “Since May 2003 the grievance procedures applicable to Illinois prisons have included a particularity requirement[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).