Pan Arctic Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting block billing format “lump[s] together multiple 12 tasks, making it impossible to evaluate . . . reasonableness
• Section 1654 “does not permit plaintiffs to appear 12 pro se where interests other than their own are at stake”
• “the district court ha[s] a duty to establish subject matter 12 jurisdiction over the removed action sua sponte, whether the parties raised the issue or not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).