Skip to main content
· 12/27/1966

Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.

Citations

  • 424 P.2d 397
  • 77 N.M. 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an action for declaratory judgment is not barred because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies if the question is one of law and not fact
  • holding that an action for declaratory judgment is not barred because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies if the question is one of law and not fact
  • holding that an action for declaratory judgment is not barred because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies if the question is one of law and not fact
  • holding that an action for declaratory judgment is not barred because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies if the question is one of law and not fact
  • stating that “the exhaustion doctrine ... applies where an administrative agency alone has authority to pass on every question raised” but not to a question of law
  • interpreting a statutory provision granting further relief as typically allowing for a coercive decree to carry into effect the requested declaratory judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noble, Chavez, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.