Pan-Am Trade & Credit Corp. v. the Campfire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pro rata clause could not be used to reduce liability below $500 for loss of part of a package
• holding invalid a “pro-rata” clause which limited recovery to the same percentage of the valuation as the percentage of the damage was to the actual damage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).