Pan Am Corp. v. Section 1110 Parties

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 1001 prosecution for false statements in unemployment benefits not precluded by unemployment benefits statute specifically addressing topic
• \[A] court may not use its review of the legislative history to rewrite a statute merely because the court disagrees with the manner Congress chose to further its policy\
• “[A] court may not use its review of the legislative history to rewrite a statute merely because the court disagrees with the manner Congress chose to further its poliey”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John Collori
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-02-02· cited 202×
• United States v. Henry G. Barr
  Third Circuit· 1992-06-24· cited 73×
• In Re Dinova
  Second Circuit· 1997-09-19· cited 51×
• United States v. John W. Milton and James Milton, United States of America v. John W. Milton
  D.C. Circuit· 1994-03-14· cited 44×
• In Re Trejos
  D. Nevada· 2006-09-25· cited 28×
• Americredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Penrod (In Re Penrod)
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 23×
• United States v. Gerald Wright
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-03-15· cited 11×
• United States v. Kun Yun Jho
  E.D. Texas· 2006-12-04· cited 11×
• United States v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
  S.D. Florida· 1998-05-12· cited 9×
• In Re Atlantic Computer Systems Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1992-01-13· cited 8×
• United States v. Koenig
  Virgin Islands· 1999-03-10· cited 5×
• In Re Pan Am Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1991-08-16· cited 4×
• Herring v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1991-08-02