· 10/29/1981
Pamer v. State
Citations
- 426 N.E.2d 1369
- 1981 Ind. App. LEXIS 1694
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing between a direct promise of immunity in exchange for a confession, one rising “to the level of a guarantee,” with a “mere exhortation”
- distinguishing between a direct promise of immunity in exchange for a confession, one rising “to the level of a guarantee,” with a “mere exhortation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Staton, Garrard, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.